AIIMS ‘lacks’ facilities for smooth access to disabled

Image result for Accessible India Campaign

The country’s premier medical institute AIIMS “lacks” facilities which allow smooth access to the physically challenged on its premises, a recent audit conducted by the hospital administration has revealed.

The audit comes in the backdrop of the Ministry of Social Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment advising public health facilities to conduct an inclusive accessibility audit to identify infrastructure gaps and make buildings disabled friendly as a part of the ‘Accessible India Campaign’.

Multiple lapses led to nurse’s death, finds AIIMS probe

Image result for committee clipart

An AIIMS committee has identified several procedural lapses leading to the death of a 28-year-old staffer in childbirth, raising serious questions on the services offered at the country’s most prestigious medical institution.

The victim, Rajbir Kaur, a nursing officer, was admitted on January 16 for normal delivery. The labour was progressing well till 5am the next day when there was a sudden drop in fetal heart rate, necessitating emergency surgery. The probe committee, headed by Dr S C Sharma of the ENT department, found that an anesthesiologist was not present during the caesearean section operation. Instead, the job was performed by a junior resident (JR) who neither had the experience nor was trained enough to handle such a complicated case.

Sources said the JR gave general anesthesia to make Kaur completely unconscious when most caesarean sections are done under spinal anesthesia. He also intubated the patient improperly. Intubation is meant to maintain oxygen level during surgery. However, in Kaur’s case, “instead of trachea – the pipe that connects the mouth to the lungs – the tube was inserted into the food pipe”, a source said.

The child was stillborn and Kaur went into distress due to aspiration – entry of stomach material into the respiratory tract. The nursing officer also suffered a cardiac arrest. She was revived but then she remained in coma for three weeks before being declared dead on February 4.

The inquiry committee also found that the consultant-on-call of obstetrics and gynaecology – whose presence is mandatory – did not turn up for the emergency operation despite being informed. She has been issued a show-cause notice by the hospital while the senior resident (SR) of anesthesiology, who was on duty, has been dismissed.

A displeasure memorandum has been issued to the SR of gynaecology, who can complete his medical training but will remain unemployable at AIIMS in future. A warning has been issued to the JR of anesthesiology who prepared the patient for surgery but later left under pressure from the residents of obstetrics and gynaecology.

Though instances of alleged medical negligence at AIIMS are many, sources said, this is a rare case where institute has been forced to accept negligence and take stern action. Also, for the first time, institute has agreed to pay Rs 10 lakh as compensation to the next of kin of the nursing officer and assured a job to a family member on compassionate grounds.

Dr K K Aggarwal, president of the Indian Medical Association, said the responsibility of consultants too should be fixed in case of procedural failure. “Residents cannot be blamed solely for such lapses,” he said.

V Srinivas, deputy director (administration) at AIIMS, has ordered the head of anesthesiology to ensure consultants from his department are available round-the-clock to oversee and supervise anesthesiology services. The panel also directed the setting up of a committee under the chairmanship of the hospital management to augment health services to AIIMS employees.

Two years ago, the son of an AIIMS employee had died at the hospital during dengue treatment. Five senior residents tendered their resignation after an inquiry report found lapses.

“Overall, we are satisfied with the AIIMS decision. But a meeting is planned with Union health minister J P Nadda to discuss certain issues,” said Manish Behl, husband of Rajbir Kaur.

“The lapses found in Kaur’s case have dented AIIMS’ image as the most prestigious medical institution in the country. If this is how the institute treats its own staff, god knows what happens in case of ordinary citizens getting treatment,” said a senior doctor at the institute.

AIIMS nurse death: Distress call made to doctor but he didn’t think it was genuine

Image result for distress call

A senior resident of the anaesthesiology department, whose services were terminated by AIIMS over the death of pregnant nurse Rajbir Kaur, told an inquiry committee that he was not present for the delivery because he did not believe the call from the gynaecology team regarding foetal distress was “genuine”.

Facing allegations of medical negligence, the senior resident defended his actions before the committee after the nurse’s death at AIIMS on February 4. Two other junior residents also faced action over her death.

The inquiry committee highlighted a number of lapses, including the fact that the C-section surgery on Kaur was conducted in an operation theatre not equipped to handle cases under general anaesthesia.

In his testimony before the eight-member inquiry panel, headed by Professor S C Sharma, head of the AIIMS ENT department, the senior resident deposed that he had, in the past, received many calls for foetal distress that were “not genuine”. So, when he received a call in Kaur’s case, he dismissed it, which led to a delay in treatment.

It is also learnt that the senior resident was absent from the maternity OT for another twin delivery, which took place before Kaur’s C-section surgery.

A senior resident of the gynaecology department, against whom the AIIMS director will issue a “memorandum of displeasure”, was asked to start Kaur’s case without full knowledge of the details.

Other lapses, the inquiry committee found, include Kaur being shifted to the back table of the maternity OT, which is typically not used for C-sections. Although the committee was told this was done to save the baby, it pointed out that the back table did not have a ready stock of emergency drugs and the OT was not fully prepared to handle such an emergency under general anaesthesia.

The committee concluded that an under-prepared OT and the absence of the senior resident of anaesthesiology were responsible for a failed intubation, which led to complications, including bradycardia or slow heart rate.

An artificial breathing tube had been mistakenly inserted into Kaur’s food pipe instead of her respiratory tract, and that food particles had entered the lungs, causing further complications. The inquiry committee pointed to the lapse as well, stating that the tube in the oesophagus could not be detected immediately because Kaur’s vitals were not linked to a monitoring system.

It is also learnt that there was chaos during the emergency, with the junior resident of anaesthesia getting little time to arrange items for intubation. Due to the chaos, two complications developed — in regurgitation, or expulsion of material from the pharynx or oesophagus; and inspiration, the process of drawing breath. The panel pointed out that the situation could have been averted had the senior resident of anaesthesia been present.